Saturday, December 21, 2024

2024: The Making of an Epoch in Japan

An opposition emerges

By Takuya Nishimura, Senior Fellow, Former Editorial Writer for The Hokkaido Shimbun
The views expressed by the author are his own and are not associated with The Hokkaido Shimbun
You can find his blog, J Update here.
December 16, 2024. Special to Asia Policy Point
 
The year 2024 will be remembered as a time of major transition in Japanese politics. An epoch-making event was the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) loss of its majority in the House of Representatives, which resulted in a hung parliament. It is likely that politics in Japan has entered an era in which the LDP can no longer enjoy unilateral dominance, and no policy decision can be made without the support of other parties.
 
Since December 2012, when it retook leadership of the Diet from the Democratic Party of Japan, the LDP has maintained its leadership with the help of a coalition partner, Komeito. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe expanded the political base of the LDP by focusing on the growth-oriented economic policy known as Abenomics. Abe also introduced the tactic of early snap elections before opposition parties are ready for them.
 
After Abe stepped down in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the LDP’s decline became apparent. Abenomics proved unable to raise the real wages of workers. Revelations about the Abe faction’s unlawful management of political funds led to a miserable defeat in the general election of the Lower House in October 2024. The assassination of Abe in 2022 and political confusion afterward marked the end of LDP-dominant politics.
 
Kishida tried to leave Abe-politics behind. He relied on his liberal principles and his Kochi-kai faction. He failed, however, to control the conservative colleagues of Abe. Ishiba, an outspoken opponent of Abe, is promoting moderate politics and listening to voices from the opposition parties. This stance became possible from the decline of conservative power in the LDP caused by the slush fund scandal and the party losing its majority in the Lower House.
 
One event that symbolized the coming of a new political era in 2024 was the revision of a budget bill, for the first time since 1996, in the extraordinary session of the Diet in December. The budget bill, coupled with the threat of a non-confidence resolution, is recognized as the most important issue, and the leading parties and the oppositions may be sharply at odds over it. The leading party would not easily accept amendments to a budget bill once it has been submitted to the Diet.
 
In the case of this year’s supplemental budget bill, the opposition leader, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ), criticized the bill for including unnecessary spending and lacking sufficient financial support for reconstruction in the Noto Peninsula following last January’s earthquake. The Ishiba Cabinet resubmitted the bill with a reduction in the total budget from 13.9 trillion yen to 12.5 trillion yen.
 
Nevertheless, the CDPJ did not vote for the revised budget bill in the Plenary Session in an effort to establish itself as the principal opposition party. Two other opposition parties, the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) and Japan Innovation Party (Nippon Ishin-no Kai) joined with the LDP to pass the bill.
 
The LDP considers the DPP the opposition power most open to its appeals for legislative action. The DPP principal concern is tax policy, including expansion of the tax credit. The LDP and Komeito found support among members of the DPP to raise the threshold for imposing income tax from 1.03 million yen in annual income to 1.78 million yen beginning in FY 2026. Gaining the support of one or more opposition parties for each piece of legislation will become the new mission for the minority government of the LDP and Komeito.
 
Although the LDP managed to maintain its control of the government by replacing Fumio Kishida with Ishiba, the approval rating for the Ishiba Cabinet in the polls has not risen. In the polls of major newspapers in December, the approval rating for the Ishiba Cabinet was 36 percent in Asahi Shimbun, 30 percent in Mainichi Shimbun and 39 percent in Yomiuri Shimbun. These percentages represent a significant decline from October, when the Ishiba administration took power, by ten to sixteen percentage points.
 
On political reform, the LDP has yet to meet the expectations of the Japanese public.    Seventy-three percent of those polled in Asahi and 86 percent in Yomiuri disapproved of Ishiba’s handling of changes to political fundraising and expenditure. Ishiba wants to add greater transparency to the Political Funds Control Act before the end of this year, but he seems to have no viable strategy for accumulating the necessary majority of votes.
 
As to another reform topic, the future of the policy activities fund, the LDP agreed with the CDPJ on abolishing it. Although the LDP wanted to reserve some exceptions of disclosure for spending in diplomatic activities, it finally withdrew its proposal after receiving consistent resistance from the opposition parties.
 
The leading parties and the opposition also reached a deal in which they would conclude on the abolition of political contributions by companies and organizations by March 2025. This means that they could not settle the most controversial issue in political reform by the end of the year.
 
This kind of struggle over legislation will be the order of the day in the Diet for the next year. In the ordinary session of the Diet, expected to be convoked in January, the debate among the parties over the FY 2025 budget will be contentious. It is too early to say whether the Ishiba Cabinet will survive to the election of the Upper House next summer.

Sunday, December 15, 2024

Monday Asia Events December 16, 2025

WHERE’S THE WATER: MEKONG DRY SEASON 2025? 12/16, 9:00-10:30pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Stimson. Speakers: Alan Basist, President, Eyes on Earth; Brian Eyler, Senior Fellow and Director, Southeast Asia Program, Stimson Center; Nguyen Y Nhu, Head of Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, Vietnam National University of Science; Courtney Weatherby, Southeast Asia Deputy Director, Stimson Center (Moderator). 

MIDDLE EAST? 12/16, 11:00-11:45am (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Carnegie. Speakers:
Sanam Vakil, Director, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatham House; Charles
Lister, Senior Fellow, Director, Syria, Countering Terrorism and Extremism Programs, Middle
East Institute. 

VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Quincy. Speakers: Steven Simon, Senior Research Fellow, Quincy; Kadir
Ustin, Executive Director, SETA Foundation; Gönül Tol, Senior Fellow, Middle East Institute;
Colonel Rich Outzen, Non-Resident Fellow, Atlantic Council.

MEASURING PRODUCTIVITY IN AN AGE OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. 12/16, 2:00-3:00pm (EST). VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Hutchins Center, Brookings. Speakers: Marshall Reinsdorf, Economic consultant; Louise Sheiner, Robert S. Kerr Senior Fellow, Economic Studies, Policy Director, Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Brookings; Nicholas Muller, Lester and Judith Lave Professor of Economics, Engineering, and Public Policy, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University; David Byrne, Principal Economist, Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Erica Groshen, Senior Economics Advisor, Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Research Fellow, Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, former Commissioner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF COMMERCE DON GRAVES. 12/16, 2:00–2:45pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Center for New American Security (CNAS). Speakers: Don Graves, Deputy Secretary of Commerce; Emily Kilcrease, Senior Fellow and Director, Energy, Economic and Security Program, CNAS.

DOLLARS AND DOMINION: U.S. BANKERS AND THE MAKING OF SUPER POWER. 12/16, 4:00-5:30pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Wilson Center. Speakers: author Mary Bridges, Ax:son Johnson Institute for Statecraft and Diplomacy postdoctoral fellow at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies; Harold James, Clause and Lore Kelly Professor in European Studies and Professor of History and International Affairs, Princeton University; Marc Levinson, Economist, Historian, and Journalist.  PURCHASE BOOK: https://amzn.to/4eXPWRM

TO GO NUCLEAR, OR NOT: THE KOREAN PENINSULA ISSUES AND US NATIONAL SECURITY. 12/16, 7:00-8:15pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsors: Institute for Corean-American Studies (ICAS). Speaker: Vipin Narang, Frank Stanton Professor of Nuclear Security and Political Science, MIT. 

Saturday, December 14, 2024

Defending Political Contributions in the Diet

Maybe not a winning strategy

By Takuya Nishimura, Senior Fellow, Former Editorial Writer for The Hokkaido Shimbun
The views expressed by the author are his own and are not associated with The Hokkaido Shimbun
You can find his blog, J Update here.
December 9, 2024. Special to Asia Policy Point

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spent the first week of December in the Diet defending his proposed policies. The main issue was greater visibility into political fundraising. Although the opposition parties urge the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to prohibit donations from companies and organizations, the LDP remains reluctant to do so. These donations are critical income for the LDP and other parties. The Democratic Party for the People (DPP), which has crucial votes in the House of Representatives, is siding with the leading coalition.
 
Both Houses of the Diet usually hold a question session for party leaders in the Plenary Sittings a few days after a prime minister’s policy speech. The session typically takes three days. Questions in the Lower House are asked on the first day and in the afternoon of the second day. Those in the Upper House are scheduled in the morning of the second day and the whole of the third day. The prime minister and other cabinet ministers may face questions from their own party leaders as well as from the opposition parties. The question session is in the form of one question and one answer without any follow-up.
 
The question session in the Plenary Sittings is followed by detailed discussions of the policies in the Committees for the Budget in both the Lower House and the Upper House. Each budget committee held a one-day meeting for questions by party leaders in this extraordinary session of the Diet. Other policy experts make detailed questions in the following meetings until the supplementary budget pass the committee. The opposition parties focus their attention on the budget committee discussions because they can go deeply into the weeds on the policies of leading parties. The budget committee discussions are not limited to the one-question-and-one-answer restriction.
 
Given his minority government, Ishiba had to protect his administration from broad reforms backed by the opposition parties. In the budget committee session of the House of Representatives, the head of Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ), Yoshihiko Noda, proposed a prohibition of political donations from companies and organizations.
 
In response, Ishiba wisely eschewed the dismissive attitude to the opposition parties that Shinzo Abe had adopted. Instead, Ishiba employed a legal argument. Ishiba contended that Article 21 of the Constitution of Japan, which guarantees freedom of expression, did not allow the Diet to prohibit such contributions.
 
“A company expresses its opinion through donation,” Ishiba told Noda. For Ishiba, a donation from a company to a political party, including a purchase of fundraising party tickets, is an act of expression. Freedom of expression is ordinarily guaranteed to protect the people from oppression by the government. Limits on political donations by companies or organizations are, to Ishiba, governmental oppression of business.
 
The opposition also argued that there was an agreement several years ago to prohibit company and organization donations. A former LDP president, Yohei Kono, recalled that his decision in 1994 to review donations from companies and organizations five years later in 1999 was an agreement to end such contributions within five years. Ishiba said the LDP had never made that kind of promise.
 
Ishiba insisted that disclosure of company and organization contributions was preferable to their abolition. Obviously, disclosure in general is important. The debate is not, however, a comparison of disclosure and abolition. The LDP will defer legislative action on contributions to next year, rejecting a request from the opposition parties to conclude work on political reform in the current extraordinary session. 
 
The LDP shared a draft of a revised Political Funds Control Act with the opposition parties. The statute would terminate the policy activity fund, prohibit the distribution of funds from the party to its members unless the use of the funds is disclosed, and establish a third-party organization to monitor political funds.
 
The CDPJ and some opposition parties submitted their own bill to amend the Political Funds Control Act to (among other things) bar company and organization contributions. The DPP did not, however, join in. Instead, the DPP agreed to co-sponsor a reform bill with Komeito, which would not contain a similar amendment. The LDP is supposed to collaborate with Komeito and DPP on their bill, as the LDP did on tax reform.
 
Ishiba continues to promote disclosure requirements in place of a prohibition. He has proposed that the Upper House lawmakers involved in the kickback scandal testify before the political ethics council if they wish to be official candidates in the election next summer. Most of the members were willing to do so. But Ishiba’s proposal would not require full disclosures, nor would it require testimony under oath. 
 
Japanese voters are beginning to understand that Ishiba’s concept of political reform is limited. While he is willing to accept minor limits on political fundraising and expenditures, such as the policy activities fund, he is not courageous enough to support fundamental reforms such as the abolition of contributions from companies and organizations.

Sunday, December 8, 2024

Monday Asia Events December 9, 2024

BOOK TALK: ULRIKE SCHAEDE, AUTHOR OF JAPAN RE-EMERGES(シン・日本の経営 悲観バイアスを排す). 12/9, 5:45-8:30pm (JST), 3:45-6:30am (EST). HYBRID. Sponsor: Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan. Speakers: Ulrike Schaede, Professor of Japanese Business, University of California San Diego, School of Global Policy and Strategy (GPS). Fee. 

UNLOCKING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE FOR SOLUTIONS TO INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF DISASTERS AND CLIMATE CHANGE. 12/9, 9:00-10:00am (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Center for Global Development. Speakers Include: Christelle Cazabat, PhD, Head of Programmes, Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre; Mohamed Amine Hillal, Financing Adviser, Solutions, UN Office of the Special Adviser on Solutions to Internal Displacement. 

REAUTHORIZING THE NATIONAL QUANTUM INITIATIVE. 12/9, Noon-1:30pm (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Hudson Institute. Speakers: Arthur Herman, Senior fellow and director of the Quantum Alliance Initiative, Hudson Institute; Ryan McKenney, General Counsel of Compliance and Director of Government Relations, Quantinuum; Rima Oueid, Senior Commercialization Executive, US Department of Energy’s Office of Technology Transitions; Allison R. Schwartz, Vice President of Global Government Relations and Public Affairs, D-Wave Quantum Inc. 

BOOK TALK: WHERE TYRANNY BEGINS: THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, THE FBI, AND THE WAR ON DEMOCRACY. 12/9, Noon-1:00pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: New America. Speaker: author David Rohde, National Security Editor, NBC News.  PURCHASE BOOK: https://amzn.to/3OAKkly

[POSTPONED] PARTNERS IN THE INDO-PACIFIC: US POLICY IN THE NEXT ADMINISTRATION. 12/9, 1:30-5:30pm (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Wilson Center. Speakers: Yoon Jin-sik, Chairman, Korea International Trade Association; Ambassador Cho Hyundong, Ambassador, Embassy of the Republic of Korea; Michael Beeman, Former Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Japan, Korea and APEC; Park Jongwon, Deputy Minister for Trade, Republic of Korea; Troy Stangarone, Director of the Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy, Deputy Director of the Indo-Pacific Program; Kayla Orta, Senior Associate, Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy; Kellee Wicker, Director, Science and Technology Innovation Program; Park Jin, Global Fellow, Former Foreign Minister, Republic of Korea; Yeo Han-koo, Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics and Former Trade Minister, Republic of Korea; Mark Kennedy, Director, Wahba Institute for Strategic Competition; Clete Willems, Partner, International Trade Policy, Akin and former Deputy Assistant to the President for International Economics and Deputy Director of the National Economic Council; Ambassador Choi Seokyoung, Former Korean Ambassador for Economic and Trade Affairs; Melissa K. Griffith, Lecturer in Technology and National Security, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies; Mario Masaya, Senior Research Director, US-ASEAN Business Council; Scott Jacobs, Senior Principal for Global Government Affairs, Coupang.

CLIMATE AND THE 2024 ELECTION. 12/11, 6:00-8:00pm (EST). IN PERSON. Sponsor: Columbia Climate School. Speakers: Sheila Foster, leading scholar of environmental and climate justice; Michael Gerrard, Andrew Sabin Professor of Professional Practice, Columbia Law School. 

TRUMP’S SECOND ACT: WHAT IT MEANS FOR ASIA AND PAKISTAN. 12/12, 9:30-10:30am (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Asia Society. Speakers: Daniel Russel, Vice President of International Security and Diplomacy, ASPI; Maleeha Lodhi, fmr. Ambassador to the US, Pakistan,. Permanent Representative to US, Pakistan; Kamran Yousaf, Journalist, Host, The Review, Express News. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/events/trumps-second-act-what-it-means-asia-and-pakistan

THE LAST FOUR YEARS OF CYBER POLICY: A RETROSPECTIVE. 12/9, 1:00-2:00pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: CSIS. Speakers: Robert Knake, Principal of Orkestrel; Kiersten Todt, CSIS Non-Resident Senior Associate, President of Wondros; Mark Montgomery, Senior Director, Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation, Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 

BOOK LAUNCH: VIETNAM’S AMERICAN WAR: A NEW HISTORY. 12/9, 4:00-5:30pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Wilson Center. Speakers: author, Pierre Asselin, Dwight E. Stanford Chair in the History of US Foreign Relations at San Diego State University; Olga Dror, Professor of History, Texas A&M University; Jessica Frazier, Associate Professor in the History and Gender and Women’s Studies Departments, University of Rhode Island.  PURCHASE BOOK: https://amzn.to/3OCchcE

Saturday, December 7, 2024

Prime Minister Ishiba’s Second Policy Speech

Trying to move forward while standing in place


By Takuya Nishimura, Senior Fellow, Former Editorial Writer for The Hokkaido Shimbun
The views expressed by the author are his own and are not associated with The Hokkaido Shimbun
You can find his blog, J Update here.
December 2, 2024. Special to Asia Policy Point


Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba delivered his second policy speech to the Diet at the beginning of an extraordinary session on November 29. Since his first policy speech in October, the LDP’s political fortunes took a sharp turn for the worse, Ishiba now faces a hung parliament. He is careful not to exacerbate the opposition parties’ resentment of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) by listening humbly to the opposition.
 
Ishiba quoted a short-termed predecessor, Tanzan Ishibashi, who had been a prime minister from the LDP for 65 days in 1956 and 1957. “As the basis of national politics, we need to establish a system of regular discussion on the issues to cooperate with each other, disclosing each standpoint and cooperating with each other to catch up with the progress of the world,” said Ishiba, quoting Ishibashi’s speech. Ishiba proposed, as a basic principle of democracy, positive discussion of the policies even in a hung parliament.
 
The opposition parties did not approve of Ishiba’s invocation of Ishibashi, who was a prominent journalist and one of the leaders of the democratic movement in Japan during the Taisho era. The head of Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ), Yoshihiko Noda, said “there is a great difference between famous Ishibashi and Ishiba.”
 
Ishiba focused on two reforms in his speech: tax reform and political reform. On taxes, the LDP has acceded to the position of the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) to mitigate the “Wall of 1.03 trillion yen.” This “wall” represents obstruction for workers to work as much as they like. 1.03 trillion yen is the threshold of annual income, above which income tax is imposed. Workers stop working to be exempt from income tax, when each of their annual income reaches 1.03 million.
 
The LDP and DPP, with Komeito, have agreed that a higher threshold of annual income should be adopted in this Diet session. In for its concession on the DPP’s policy, the LDP received an assurance from the DPP that its members will vote yes to the supplemental budget of Ishiba Cabinet.
 
Ishiba also promised to introduce a bill to reduce the gasoline tax, another proposal from the DPP. “To wrap up our economic stimulus plan, we have been making utmost efforts to introduce excellent policies beyond the border of parties,” said Ishiba in the speech, even if he did not mention when the reduction would be introduced.
 
He stressed his willingness to listen to the opposition. So far, however, Ishiba has agreed to accept policies only from the DPP; he has had no meaningful policy discussions with other opposition parties.
 
Ishiba’s limited approach has not enamored him to the other opposition parties and invited a backlash on political reform legislation. Ishiba offered three reforms: abolition of the policy activities fund, which does not require disclosure of the purpose for which each party used the fund, establishment of a third-party organization to monitor political funds, and the creation of a public database of political funds reports. “I will sincerely deal with those issues through multi-partisan discussions to restore public confidence to our politics,” Ishiba said.
 
Three opposition parties, CDPJ, the Japan Innovation Party (Nippon Ishin-no Kai), and the Japan Communist Party, rejected Ishiba’s reform package because it did not include  a prohibition on contributions the business sector and organizations to political parties. Although the LDP promised to review company donations in 1993, the issue has languished for decades.
 
The problem is that the LDP now relies on these very donations. According to the political funds report for 2023, released by the Ministry for Internal Affairs and Communications on November 29, the People’s Political Association, which accepts donations for the LDP from companies, received 240 million yen of donations from private companies or business organizations in 2023. The biggest donor was the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, which includes Toyota and Honda. These car exporters will have benefited from LDP policies that are designed to depreciate the Japanese yen.
 
Another piece of bad news for Ishiba and the LDP is that the opposition parties are taking more integrated actions. They are not only consulting with each other on legislation in the Diet, they are considering cooperation in the election of the Upper House next summer.
 
For example, Ishin elected the governor of Osaka, Hirofumi Yoshimura, as the new leader of the party, replacing Nobuyuki Baba who had been reluctant to cooperate with the CDPJ. Yoshimura announced that he would seek further cooperation among the opposition parties to field integrated opposition candidates in prefectural single-seat constituencies in the next Upper House election.
 
A modest piece of good news for Ishiba is that there appears to be no obvious power in the LDP that opposes his leadership – at least so far. But frustration with Ishiba will swell if he fails to raise the public’s approval rating for his cabinet. The Upper House election is fast approaching (by July 27, 2025), and it will present another test of the LDP’s leadership.

Sunday, December 1, 2024

Monday Asia Events December 2, 2024

IMPLICATIONS OF AN IRANIAN NUCLEAR BOMB. 12/2, 10:30-11:45am (EST).
VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Heritage Foundation. Speakers: Right Hon. Liz Truss, Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; Nile Gardiner, Director, Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom and Bernard and Barbara Lomas Fellow; Robert Peters, Research Fellow, Nuclear Deterrence and Missile Defense; Andrea Stricker, Deputy Director and Research Fellow, Nonproliferation and Biodefense Program, FDD; Olli Heinonen, Senior Fellow, The Stimson Center. 

"LIQUIDSCAPE" AND THE ART OF CURATING FROM REGIONAL JAPAN. 12/2, 8:00-9:15am (JST), IN PERSON ONLY. Sponsor: Asia Society Japan. Speaker: Yuka Takahashi, Curator, Arts Maebashi.   

BOOK TALK: THE TROUBLEMAKER: HOW JIMMY LAI BECAME A BILLIONAIRE, HONG KONG’S GREATEST DISSIDENT, AND CHINA’S MOST FEARED CRITIC. 12/2, 11:00am-Noon (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: AEI. Speaker: author Mark L. Clifford, President, Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation. https://www.aei.org/events/the-troublemaker-how-jimmy-lai-became-a-billionaire-hong-kongs-greatest-dissident-and-chinas-most-feared-critic/ PURCHASE BOOK: https://amzn.to/4ihviyE 
 
NEW PARTY POLITICS OF EAST ASIAN DEMOCRACIES. 12/2, Noon-1:15pm (EST). HYBRID. Sponsors: Weatherhead Center Program on U.S.-Japan Relations; Korea Institute, Harvard University; Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School. Speakers: Joan Cho, Associate Professor of East Asian Studies, Wesleyan University; Aram Hur, Kim Koo Chair in Korean Studies and Assistant Professor of Political Science, The Fletcher School, Tufts University; Koichi Nakano, Visiting Scholar, Program on US-Japan Relations, Harvard University and Professor of Political Science, Sophia University; Daniel Ziblatt, Director, Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies and Eaton Professor of the Science of Government, Harvard University. 

ANGELA MERKEL IN CONVERSATION WITH BARACK OBAMA. 12/2, Noon (EST). IN PERSON ONLY. Sponsor: The Anthem. Speakers: Angela Merkel, former Chancellor of Germany; Barack Obama, former U.S. President. Fee.

THE FUTURE OF US-CHINA RELATIONS AFTER THE ELECTION. 12/2, 3:30-4:30pm (PST) 6:30-7:30pm (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: UC San Diego School of Global Policy Strategy. Speakers: Susan Shirk, Director Emeritus, 21st Century China Center, UC San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy; Xinbo Wu, Dean, Institute of International Studies, Director, Center for American Studies, Fudan University; Richard Madsen, Director, Fudan-UC Center on Contemporary China, Professor Emeritus, Sociology, UC San Diego.